Christ, I wish people would give the man a break on this essay. Instead of parsing the perceived inconsistencies in the words, how about looking at the spirit

Christ, I wish people would give the man a break on this essay. Instead of parsing the perceived inconsistencies in the words, how about looking at the spirit of what he's trying to do. Look at the default use of people's minds who have been trained to solve difficult problems are being put to today: In bureauacracies on menial things that won't mean much of a difference in the world. What is the problem with someone saying: "This is wrong, and I'm going to say it. I'm going to push the meme out there that this is bullshit and the default should be to maximize your return on your talent and work, and have a positive impact on society as a result." If a metaphor or phrasing or analogy is misconstrued, who cares? That's too subjective anyway. If the default spirit was imbued in more technical people than not, I'm guessing we'd be in a better place. [descend from soapbox]