> piracy as a threat to their revenue streams, hence "competition" By your logic, I can "compete" with GM by stealing all of their car inventory and blowing up

> piracy as a threat to their revenue streams, hence "competition" By your logic, I can "compete" with GM by stealing all of their car inventory and blowing up all their factories in Detroit. I don't think that makes sense. > the market has simply changed Strongly disagree. What exactly is the new market? Selling journal t-shirts? > yet the peer review process relies on unpaid volunteers > Publication bias is a thing I say that publishers add much more value than pirates. Sure, publishers aren't perfect and others add value too. So what?