2 ms·
> Publishers select the reviewers, analyze the reviews, and accept or reject. all this tells me is that there's a serious lack of adequate tools or some common
by leeoniya 9y ago
> Publishers select the reviewers, analyze the reviews, and accept or reject.
all this tells me is that there's a serious lack of adequate tools or some common, open platform to facilitate this. it was hard [expensive] to collaborate on sourcecode before Github; now it isnt. it was difficult to research prior art for patents, now it isnt via patents.stackexchange.
- allenz 9y agoI agree, editorial committees based on a software workflow could be a real competitor to the current publishers. I'd caution that (1) everything sounds easy from a high level view, when we don't see the complexity, and (2) that the hardest problems are not technical, but social.