3 ms·
I don't know of any .NET implementation of ZPT. What makes you find Spark's syntax to be dirtier than ZPT? Is it the fact that the Spark example I gave isn't v
by troygoode 16y ago
I don't know of any .NET implementation of ZPT.
What makes you find Spark's syntax to be dirtier than ZPT? Is it the fact that the Spark example I gave isn't valid XHTML like ZPT is? If so, that is simply out of convenience - Spark also offers a way to use proper XML namespacing to achieve complete XHTML compliance:
http://www.sparkviewengine.com/documentation/syntax http://www.sparkviewengine.com/documentation/syntax
(scroll all the way down)
- rbanffy 16y agoCool. And yes - the shortcuts are something I frown upon. Template languages should not be so expressive as to create an incentive to ASP-style coding, nor too castrated as to prevent you from doing whatever you want. I think ZPT is right in the middle of the sweet spot.