3 ms·
> Sorry, but Go isn't in the same category as Rust or C/C++. From the article: > 99% of the time, Go is "good enough" and that 1% where it isn't, you'll know.
by Jdam 9y ago
> Sorry, but Go isn't in the same category as Rust or C/C++.
From the article:
> 99% of the time, Go is "good enough" and that 1% where it isn't, you'll know. And then take a look at Rust, because the two languages complement each other pretty well.
- SideburnsOfDoom 9y agoYes, that means that 99% of the time you don't need a systems programming language. It's probably also true, depending on the specific case.
- wtetzner 9y agoAnd for that 99%, Java or C# or OCaml or any number of other languages were already good enough. Not really sure what Go brings to the table.