3 ms·
I don't intuitively understand why Go was so space efficient (#2 and ahead of C) but then so time+energy inefficient wrt C (3.23 and 2.83 vs 1.00 and 1.00). An
by CalChris 9y ago
I don't intuitively understand why Go was so space efficient (#2 and ahead of C) but then so time+energy inefficient wrt C (3.23 and 2.83 vs 1.00 and 1.00).
Any clues?
- Lev1a 9y agoMy guess would be that Go's GC (which is supposedly pretty good) takes care of space but pushes up time and CPU usage anyway.
- iainmerrick 9y agoNo, GC shouldn't take that much time.
- Lev1a 9y agoI assume it just adds up in these kinds of "benchmark" tests.