>parents can choose to make medical decisions that they know will result in the death of a child (eg refusing treatment for life-threatening diseases due to rel

>parents can choose to make medical decisions that they know will result in the death of a child (eg refusing treatment for life-threatening diseases due to religious concerns). That is false. Parents cannot legally deny their children life-saving treatment. Also, I'm not sure where I am being hyperbolic. Peter Singer literally does advocate for the "right" to kill young children for a long time after their birth. So if you say that Peter Singer offers an "easy" moral approach to abortion, I have to ask whether you actually do agree with his logic and follow it to the same ultimate conclusions that he does.