3 ms·
Even today people with training in modes of therapy that are more or less theoretically divorced from Freudianism will say that "Freud is the basis of all thera
by solidsnack9000 9y ago
Even today people with training in modes of therapy that are more or less theoretically divorced from Freudianism will say that "Freud is the basis of all therapy". He wasn't the first person to philosophize about the parts of the soul or the first person to offer therapy; but he was a very prolific writer and thinker early on in our attempts to bring a scientific understanding and therapeutic emphasis to what had previously been the province of religion and disinterested philosophers.
It is undeniable that he failed in many significant ways, but three basic ideas to seem to hold up:
* The transference and the counter-transference -- the patient projects on to the therapist and vice versa
* The defense mechanisms -- methods by which people seek to escape not from their situation but from their feelings about it
* The corrective emotional experience -- therapy provides a way, in part through the transference, for the patient to work through feelings that they otherwise deny themselves
Freud had many crazy ideas, too -- and both he and his successors devoted far too much time and effort to these crazy ones. Quit when you are ahead.
- emerged 9y agoMay we one day succeed enough to be considered by many a failure.
- beagle3 9y agoVarious dictators and the vast majority of televangalists (e.g. Joel Osteen) come to mind. Are you sure you want to succeed that way? I don't; and while Freud's history has many redeeming features, the saying is "at least Mussolini made the trains on time"[0], so the latter might also have had redeeming features. [0] But see https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2016/11/the-problem-with-mussolini-and-his-trains/507764/ https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2016/11/the-problem-w... ; likewise, it's possible that freud's positives will turn out not to be.