3 ms·
The ruling is correct, but the law is stupid.
by c3534l 9y ago
The ruling is correct, but the law is stupid.
- sethammons 9y agoJury Nullification is always an option.
- c3534l 9y agoThere was no jury. This was a Supreme Court ruling.
- odammit 9y agoGuilty or not could you imagine the rest of his life. At an interview "so I googled you... what's this about the Supreme Court having a ruling over your dick pic, brah" Better start his own business or get to flipping them burgz.
- ikeboy 9y agoYou can change your name to avoid it coming up in Google, but would still show up on a background check, I think.
- odammit 9y agoUntil you get to that "previously used names" line on the walmart application. Woof. That's gonna be a tough life.
- return0 9y agowhy is a dick pic such a big deal?
- rothbardrand 9y agoWhich is inexcusable. The Supreme Court is clearly corrupted and failing at its one job.... which is to shut stuff like this down and be a check on the irresponsibility of the legislative and executive branches.
- c3534l 9y agoThe Supreme Court's role is not to change the laws when they seem unjust, it's to provide a clear and coherent interpretation of them. The Supreme Court oversteps its constitutional bounds when it starts to ask what the law should be rather than what it is.
- kelnos 9y agoFalse. Aside from unconstitutionality, the place to fix bad laws is in Congress. They're only irresponsible because we keep electing them no matter what they do.
- Bud 9y agoSupreme Court of the state of Washington, actually.
- c3534l 9y agoOh, I don't know how I missed that.