3 ms·
Yeah, a lot of advances in psychology start with refuting one of Freud's ideas, but it's no different than modern (Enlightenment) physics starting with refuting
by brighteyes 9y ago
Yeah, a lot of advances in psychology start with refuting one of Freud's ideas, but it's no different than modern (Enlightenment) physics starting with refuting Aristotle. It doesn't mean Aristotle wasn't a massively influential genius. In fact that Aristotle and Freud are the starting point for what came after them shows how important they were.
Freud deserves credit for revolutionizing an entire field, creating something new and coherent. Given the context of his time, he was a genius, like Aristotle was in his time.
Also, while most of Freud's details are of course pitifully ridiculous today, the basic insight that the unconscious matters, and that we can see its influence in indirect ways, is still a valid idea today. It's debated a lot, but it's a core concept we've never abandoned, so he deserves credit for that too.
- valuearb 9y agoIt's not a valid idea, there is little to no scientific validity in the entire world of psychology. Psychologists will continue to chase their tails "proving" things with unscientific methods that will later be unproven. The fact that he was the first pseudo scientist to defraud the public in this field doesn't make him a genius any more than a carnival huckster is.
- LMYahooTFY 9y agoCare to elaborate on your threshold of scientifically valid then?
- valuearb 9y agoRepeatable experiments that don't rely on whisks of statistical credibility.