I just read both. Whatever else you think of Breitbart, in this case their article actually contains some interesting information not included in the WaPo arti

I just read both. Whatever else you think of Breitbart, in this case their article actually contains some interesting information not included in the WaPo article, including comments from Gab's lawyer about why he thinks the case has merit. The WaPo article is clearly slanted towards Google and against Gab, and the Breitbart article is the reverse. If you're interested in a balanced view you should probably read both.