I'm happy with my response, although I understand that for a college with a lot of money to spend, the definition and mission of fellows can be quite broad. To

I'm happy with my response, although I understand that for a college with a lot of money to spend, the definition and mission of fellows can be quite broad. To defend my position a little more, I was asking for a definition of the job of visiting fellow that was presented in a format that advanced the institution's mission. I found the Wikipedia page quite adequate in that regard. I also understand that people like their colleges with a diverse and outstanding mix of personalities and folks with unusual life experiences to share. I have no problem with that. I think it's a great idea. It's just that it's a sinecure. Nothing wrong with being honest about it. Manning or some military person is not going to visit Harvard and proceed to discover the cure for cancer. It's a checkbox both on their resume and the college's brochure. I think it's a mistake to view this in terms of supporting or attacking either Harvard or Manning. The purpose of my question was simply to clarify terms of the discussion. It seems to me that there are two definitions of "visiting fellow'. One definition is based on the academic credentials of the fellow. The other is based on the type of experience the unviersity can provide undergrads by having somewhat famous people hanging around. I'm okay with that.