You're correct but this tidbit also exposes the article's limited scope. It's sweeping the cost of public transportation under the rug and then providing unsubs

You're correct but this tidbit also exposes the article's limited scope. It's sweeping the cost of public transportation under the rug and then providing unsubstantiated opinion on the "adverse impact" of the thing the author doesn't like. To be clear I'm not arguing for or against parking or public transportation. But I do think we should be forming policies with more data and less opinion.