8 ms·

To Abolish the Chinese Language: On a Century of Reformist Rhetoric

66 points by lermontov 9y ago

roddylindsay 9y ago
I'm reminded of this passage from the delightful article "Why Chinese is so Damn Hard": 'I was once at a luncheon with three Ph.D. students in the Chinese Department at Peking University, all native Chinese (one from Hong Kong). I happened to have a cold that day, and was trying to write a brief note to a friend canceling an appointment that day. I found that I couldn't remember how to write the character 嚔, as in da penti 打喷嚔 "to sneeze". I asked my three friends how to write the character, and to my surprise, all three of them simply shrugged in sheepish embarrassment. Not one of them could correctly produce the character. Now, Peking University is usually considered the "Harvard of China". Can you imagine three Ph.D. students in English at Harvard forgetting how to write the English word "sneeze"?? Yet this state of affairs is by no means uncommon in China.' http://pinyin.info/readings/texts/moser.html http://pinyin.info/readings/texts/moser.html Book looks very interesting, just ordered a copy.
- c3534l 9y ago
  Sneeze isn't a particularly difficult word to spell. It's taken me many years to master the art of spelling "bureaucracy" and I literally just now misspelled "entrepreneur" and now "misspelled." Hell, people are spelling "their" incorrectly. THEIR!
  - jaggederest 9y ago
    Yes, but "thier" problem is not that they aren't "mispelling", it's that they can't remember the character at all. It would be the equivalent of missing a stroke in a chinese character - if my minimal experience from Japanese is any guide, people would still be able to roughly figure out which character it was, but it would be considered a bit crude. That's where incorrect spelling is in english. They're not talking about that, they're saying "We can't remember how the word looks at all". It's pretty neat as a problem to have, to be able to say it but not even have an idea about how it might be spelled.
    - yorwba 9y ago
      "Not one of them could correctly produce the character." is slightly different from "We can't remember how the word looks at all". I would assume they know it's spelled with the 口 radical, but they might get the details of 疐 wrong. FWIW, I could write it correctly, but I also spend 40 minutes per day practicing vocabulary, the bulk of which is spent on writing the characters.
    - vacri 9y ago
      > it's that they can't remember the character at all I can guarantee you that each of those students would recognise the character if they saw it, they just can't generate it correctly from scratch.
  - microcolonel 9y ago
    Well, bureaucracy is half French and half Greek. Bureau being the French word for "desk", imported into English to refer to the metaphorical desk. The "-cracy" part is from -κρατίᾱ, a derivative of κράτος (power) which ends up denoting a form of rule (see also autocracy, plutocracy, democracy; all of these purely Greek). The key to good English spelling is the meticulous study of etymology; I learned this when I was about five years of age. Once you get used to thinking about words in terms of their root languages, then things start to make sense most of the time, except for all the exceptions.
    - eecc 9y ago
      "The key to good English spelling is the meticulous study of etymology" I'd argue it's the key to good understanding and use of any language
      - notahacker 9y ago
        From a spelling point of view there are certainly exceptions. Bahasa Indonesia and its Malaysian cousin involve a remarkable amount of words borrowed English, but it doesn't show in the phonetic orthography
- nie 9y ago
  As a native Chinese, I can't produce 嚔 either. I'm interested in the statistics among college-educated Chinese how many _can actually_ write down that character...
  - ufmace 9y ago
    I'm curious about that original passage - is the real reason for that something like that a native Chinese person writing a letter to another native Chinese person telling them that they were sick and had to cancel something would not phrase things like that, using the literal word for "to sneeze"? Is some other phrase or wording more commonly used to communicate things like that?
    - schoen 9y ago
      I was assuming the note would be something like Dear Dr. Li, I'm sorry to say that I have to cancel our appointment this afternoon because I've been coughing and sneezing all day. I look forward to seeing you when I feel better again.
      - contingencies 9y ago
        Modern Chinese would write 感冒 (gan mao; 'have a cold') instead. Much simpler to remember. Besides, they could send an audio message on WeChat, which functions like a global distributed walkie-talkie, or type it in pinyin, at which point the computer would auto-guess the characters and they'd only have to remember vaguely whether those characters "looked right" with some general degree of confidence, which is exactly how I input them myself. If they really had to write, they'd use the same method on their cellphone then copy the characters over. If the reader couldn't recognize the characters, an OCR system on their phone could do it for them. In short: through technology, this is now a solved problem.
  - vorg 9y ago
    Mainland Chinese use 嚏 instead of 嚔. I suspect they don't often know how to write that character because the phonetic root 疐 is only also used in 懥. Anyway, when writing, wouldn't Chinese use same grass-script style shorthand for it?
- dibujante 9y ago
  You can fake it, though, just like you can misspell a word in English. Write 打喷替 and someone will figure out what you mean.
  - deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
- mcguire 9y ago
  Another interesting writer is John DeFrancis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_DeFrancis); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_DeFrancis); the two books I have read are Visible Speech, a general examination of writing forms, with Chinese as an important case (and it was written before Mayan writing translation was commonly known, so it makes an interesting comparison with Breaking the Maya Code), and The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy, an in-depth look at Chinese in the form of addressing some of the (really wacky) myths about Chinese writing. IIRC, he reports several actual difficulties in learning to read and write: * You have to learn many, many characters. And using a dictionary is non-trivial. (IIRC, the key is stroke order.) * You may have to learn a different language. Written Chinese is written Standard (a.k.a. Mandarin) Chinese. If you happen to have grown up speaking Cantonese, you'll have to learn a related, but different language. * Traditionally, the "proper" written language is classical, and by 'classical' I mean old. Imagine speaking modern French or Italian and writing in classical 1st century BC-1st century AD Latin. * Many characters have a "sound" component and a "meaning" component. That might help, right? You could sort of sound things out. That is, if you were into historical phonology---like every other written language, the sound component as written was frozen when the character entered the language.
  - dilemma 9y ago
    >* You have to learn many, many characters. And using a dictionary is non-trivial. (IIRC, the key is stroke order.) Correct. Dictionary apps makes it easy to look up characters, however. >* You may have to learn a different language. Written Chinese is written Standard (a.k.a. Mandarin) Chinese. If you happen to have grown up speaking Cantonese, you'll have to learn a related, but different language. This is a regional/cultural thing and has nothing to do with the Chinese (Mandarin) language. French isn't a bad language because the Swiss also learn German. >* Traditionally, the "proper" written language is classical, and by 'classical' I mean old. Imagine speaking modern French or Italian and writing in classical 1st century BC-1st century AD Latin. What? Nonsensical and incorrect. Mandarin evolves like every other language in existence. >* Many characters have a "sound" component and a "meaning" component. That might help, right? You could sort of sound things out. That is, if you were into historical phonology---like every other written language, the sound component as written was frozen when the character entered the language. Again, what? 90% of Chinese characters are phonetic compounds where the component on the left modifies the sound of the main component. In general, these types of ideas that the Chinese/Japanese/other non-alphabetic languages are inferior are strongly culturally biased (what exists in my own culture is correct, other cultures are wrong) and has hints of /r/iamverysmart (you actually have no idea what you're talking about).
- muddyrivers 9y ago
  嚔 is indeed hard to produce, even for Chinese native speakers. It is an example of an exception, though, like entrepreneur in English (I know it is from French, so the spelling is "unusual"). First, people don't write 喷嚔 often, although they use it in spoken Chinese regularly. It seems people are reluctant to write down words that describe certain body functions. For 嚔, the difficulty is that its "sound" component is extremely rare in Chinese characters. The majority of Chinese characters are 形声字. Each of such character has a "sound" component and a "meaning" component. Many characters can share the same "sound" component. The "sound" components are usually the "harder" component in writing, in that they have more strokes. (For 嚔, the rectangle at the left is the "meaning" component. The complicated looking part at the right is the "sound" component.) As a result, if one remembers how to write one character, one can simply remember many other characters with the same "sound" component. If one of these characters is commonly used, it is an easy task to remember all the others. I only know two other characters who share the same "sound" component with 嚔, and I don't think people use them now. They only appear in ancient books. So 嚔 is a character you don't often write down, and there are no other commonly used characters who shared the same "sound" component. Then you get a character who is hard for native Chinese speakers as well.
  - jessriedel 9y ago
    I like this analogy, but doesn't it just sort of point to the non-phonetic aspects of Chinese as the problem? If every time I had a hard time remembering how to spell something I couldn't even write down an approximation ("entrepenor") that someone or my computer could error-correct, it would strike me as a real flaw to the writing system! (I'm assuming here that when Chinese writers can't remember the symbol for an unusual word, they also can't write down a recognizable approximation. Maybe not true?)
    - schoen 9y ago
      They could use a computer with a pinyin input method and see a list of characters that have that pronunciation. In this case they could enter "tì" or "ti4" and get a list something like https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/t%C3%AC#Romanization https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/t%C3%AC#Romanization but probably with a nicer interface. (They do have to be able to recognize the written character when they see it. Here the character Moser was trying to produce is one of the forms under item 5.) Also, there are statistical techniques to show the most probable characters in context following particular other characters, not just the most frequent characters overall. For example, if Moser had just typed 喷 on a computer and then was looking for a character pronounced "tì", software could suggest 嚏 as the most likely possibility in that situation. But it would probably be a fairly terrible situation when not using a computer.
ufmace 9y ago
This article touches on a broader point that I had always found fascinating - what is the relationship of language to the ability of a culture to spread around the world? The promotion of American culture around the world owes a lot IMO to the British Empire and it's promotion of English around the world. Which in turn owes a lot to the culture of the British Empire, and the relatively light-handed way in which they ruled it. That's the only way it was possible for them to dominate and spread their language and culture throughout so many places. Control of it as a formal empire fell apart, but it left the seeds for kind of a soft American empire, when America became a world power and started spreading ideology and massive amounts of media around the world. It's interesting that nothing like this seems to happen for any other language and culture combination, most notably Chinese for this article. How much of the lack of ability for Chinese to spread as a culture is just how damn hard it is to learn Chinese as a non-native? Or is it that the Chinese just don't seem that interested in spreading their culture and ideology farther than they can directly benefit from? Or is the fact that they aren't interested in that based on them knowing and even taking pride in their language and culture being particularly impenetrable? Related to this article, it seems notable that movements within China to radically simplify the language never seem to pick up much steam. Sure, it would be insanely complex to do on a logistical level, but even above that, it seems like nobody is much interested in it. It reminds me a little of thinking about AIs. They say that an AI will only want to do what it gets programmed to want to do. It may become smarter and more powerful, but there's no reason for it to change what it wants to do. Changing what it wants to do would itself be an action, and it has no reason to take that action, because it isn't part of what it originally wants to do. It seems similar that cultures sort of evolve to care about some things and not care about other things, and efforts to make them care about something they don't care about at best have quite the uphill battle.
- kccqzy 9y ago
  > It's interesting that nothing like this seems to happen for any other language and culture combination, most notably Chinese for this article. False. It has happened. Chinese culture has spread to neighboring countries, but that's almost a millennium ago. Ever wonder why in the Unicode BMP there's a huge block of "CJK ideographs"? It's because historically the Japanese, Korean, (and Vietnamese) all use Chinese characters in their communication. Sure their respective languages are very different but the script is the same. And at that time China had plenty of influence over these neighboring countries.
peterburkimsher 9y ago
Chinese is here to stay. There are enough people who speak it. Characters are not the problem. Simplified characters made it twice as complicated. What Chinese and Japanese need are spaces. I struggled for 2 years to study Chinese here in Taiwan. I tried many ways (see the blog), and wasn't picking it up. Then I wrote Pingtype, which puts spaces between the words, colours for tones, and a literal translation. I started reading the Bible every day using it, and also listening to music and reading the lyrics. Since then I've learned so much more. https://pingtype.github.io https://pingtype.github.io The problem is not the language. It's the education materials. Now I think that traditional characters are better, because I can rebuild a character from typing only the parts I know into Pingtype's keyboard and searching for a suitable match. I had to build my own tools, but I wish these could be popularised to help the thousands of foreigners who give up learning Chinese. Support for Taiwanese Hokkien is also included in Pingtype, thanks to the Taigi dictionary for POJ transcription. See the Advanced -> Regional section. It is very different to Mandarin, but learning Chinese is a necessary stepping stone. I'm working on a lyrics video of some popular songs by Fire Ex as some educational materials. Please give me feedback on Pingtype; only a few hundred people have visited the page and it's kind of depressing. I don't know how to do marketing, so it's not catching on. Even if the tone colours and pinyin don't become widely used, I really wish that spaces between words could be introduced to this beautiful language.
- dionian 9y ago
  I am not sure I know what you mean by 'spaces', but I think I do. It's the fact that there is no natural separation of grouped words. Without vocab it's really hard to understand a sentence. Also there is a cultural element (much more so than other languages perhaps) But thats kind of the advantage too, there is no preset standard grammatical way of looking at anything, you simply take it all in and infer everything on context. No learning verb conjugations and endless rules like in some languages (I'm looking at you, French) People are saying Chinese is harder to learn than other languages, and it's true, but mostly only for the first few years, after that, it's way easier to learn than a new romance language for a native speaker of a romance language
  - 9y ago
ilamont 9y ago
A couple of thoughts to share, as someone who studied Mandarin in Taiwan the 1990s, encourages his kids to learn Chinese (1), and still loves to study 4-character colloquialisms: * "Chinese is a world script" - The author Tom Mullaney notes the rising popularity of Chinese classes in schools all over the world. I think Chinese script is actually holding back Mandarin from becoming more widely spoken. It's difficult to write properly, and adds another layer of complexity to remembering vocabulary. I think it's much easier for people to learn a language that has an alphabet-based script, and it's possible to go further with such a language in a given period of time. * Paradoxically, the rise of software to write Chinese characters has really made it much easier to write. I say this as someone who learned in the dark ages before such software was widely available. If I had to write a sentence in Chinese using a pen and paper it would be painful for both myself and the reader ... but on my phone or using a laptop or desktop computer I can manage social media, email, and other lightweight uses thanks to easy pinyin input systems. It's improved my reading ability, too, because now I am interacting in Chinese on my devices using language that's more like spoken Mandarin, whereas 20 years ago most of the printed materials I encountered tended to be written in more formal style. * Mandarin as a world language. The increasing importance of the Chinese economy is becoming a big driver for spoken Mandarin in other parts of the world. I've encountered Thais and Vietnamese who can speak it quite well (but not write) in order to do business or interact with Chinese tourists. A friend who recently visited Italy saw the same thing in high-end shops with young Italians behind the counters being able to speak proficient Mandarin. * I disagree with the idea presented by @peterburkimsher that a lack of spaces are a problem. Chinese grammar is very straightforward, and in my opinion it's not hard to figure where words start and end (even if you don't know a specific term). (Incidentally, kudos to Peter for developing his system ... I don't have specific suggestions to market it, but I like the idea of leveraging Fire Ex and other hooks). * There are interesting examples in Vietnam (2) and Korea of societies that abandoned Chinese characters in favor of their own alphabets. It's true that cultures lose the connection with ancient literature and older historical documents ... but not their history, thanks to the spread of literacy and public education combined with a strong interest in history and famous people from centuries past. 1. http://www.ilamont.com/2014/10/our-review-of-chinese-summer-camp-in.html http://www.ilamont.com/2014/10/our-review-of-chinese-summer-... 2. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/chunom.htm https://www.omniglot.com/writing/chunom.htm
unlmtd1 9y ago
Hanzi is a better interface between man and computers than phonetic systems, which add an additions compilation step (from phonetic to logic). The keyboard was the problem for hanzi, but now with motion, touch, speech interfaces boosted in their accuracy by ML, hanzi will dethrone Latin as the no1 man-computer interface.
grizzles 9y ago
This seems like a good thread to ask. Can anyone recommend some good Chinese language learning apps/resources? After a brief dalliance awhile back, I'd like to learn to speak Mandarin, but having learned Japanese I'm keen to avoid written literacy in the language as I know how much more that would complicate things.

66 points by lermontov 9y ago

I'm reminded of this passage from the delightful article "Why Chinese is so Damn Hard": 'I was once at a luncheon with three Ph.D. students in the Chinese Department at Peking University, all native Chinese (one from Hong Kong). I happened to have a cold that day, and was trying to write a brief note to a friend canceling an appointment that day. I found that I couldn't remember how to write the character 嚔, as in da penti 打喷嚔 "to sneeze". I asked my three friends how to write the character, and to my surprise, all three of them simply shrugged in sheepish embarrassment. Not one of them could correctly produce the character. Now, Peking University is usually considered the "Harvard of China". Can you imagine three Ph.D. students in English at Harvard forgetting how to write the English word "sneeze"?? Yet this state of affairs is by no means uncommon in China.' http://pinyin.info/readings/texts/moser.html http://pinyin.info/readings/texts/moser.html Book looks very interesting, just ordered a copy.

c3534l 9y ago
Sneeze isn't a particularly difficult word to spell. It's taken me many years to master the art of spelling "bureaucracy" and I literally just now misspelled "entrepreneur" and now "misspelled." Hell, people are spelling "their" incorrectly. THEIR!
- jaggederest 9y ago
  Yes, but "thier" problem is not that they aren't "mispelling", it's that they can't remember the character at all. It would be the equivalent of missing a stroke in a chinese character - if my minimal experience from Japanese is any guide, people would still be able to roughly figure out which character it was, but it would be considered a bit crude. That's where incorrect spelling is in english. They're not talking about that, they're saying "We can't remember how the word looks at all". It's pretty neat as a problem to have, to be able to say it but not even have an idea about how it might be spelled.
  - yorwba 9y ago
    "Not one of them could correctly produce the character." is slightly different from "We can't remember how the word looks at all". I would assume they know it's spelled with the 口 radical, but they might get the details of 疐 wrong. FWIW, I could write it correctly, but I also spend 40 minutes per day practicing vocabulary, the bulk of which is spent on writing the characters.
  - vacri 9y ago
    > it's that they can't remember the character at all I can guarantee you that each of those students would recognise the character if they saw it, they just can't generate it correctly from scratch.
- microcolonel 9y ago
  Well, bureaucracy is half French and half Greek. Bureau being the French word for "desk", imported into English to refer to the metaphorical desk. The "-cracy" part is from -κρατίᾱ, a derivative of κράτος (power) which ends up denoting a form of rule (see also autocracy, plutocracy, democracy; all of these purely Greek). The key to good English spelling is the meticulous study of etymology; I learned this when I was about five years of age. Once you get used to thinking about words in terms of their root languages, then things start to make sense most of the time, except for all the exceptions.
  - eecc 9y ago
    "The key to good English spelling is the meticulous study of etymology" I'd argue it's the key to good understanding and use of any language
    - notahacker 9y ago
      From a spelling point of view there are certainly exceptions. Bahasa Indonesia and its Malaysian cousin involve a remarkable amount of words borrowed English, but it doesn't show in the phonetic orthography
nie 9y ago
As a native Chinese, I can't produce 嚔 either. I'm interested in the statistics among college-educated Chinese how many _can actually_ write down that character...
- ufmace 9y ago
  I'm curious about that original passage - is the real reason for that something like that a native Chinese person writing a letter to another native Chinese person telling them that they were sick and had to cancel something would not phrase things like that, using the literal word for "to sneeze"? Is some other phrase or wording more commonly used to communicate things like that?
  - schoen 9y ago
    I was assuming the note would be something like Dear Dr. Li, I'm sorry to say that I have to cancel our appointment this afternoon because I've been coughing and sneezing all day. I look forward to seeing you when I feel better again.
    - contingencies 9y ago
      Modern Chinese would write 感冒 (gan mao; 'have a cold') instead. Much simpler to remember. Besides, they could send an audio message on WeChat, which functions like a global distributed walkie-talkie, or type it in pinyin, at which point the computer would auto-guess the characters and they'd only have to remember vaguely whether those characters "looked right" with some general degree of confidence, which is exactly how I input them myself. If they really had to write, they'd use the same method on their cellphone then copy the characters over. If the reader couldn't recognize the characters, an OCR system on their phone could do it for them. In short: through technology, this is now a solved problem.
- vorg 9y ago
  Mainland Chinese use 嚏 instead of 嚔. I suspect they don't often know how to write that character because the phonetic root 疐 is only also used in 懥. Anyway, when writing, wouldn't Chinese use same grass-script style shorthand for it?
dibujante 9y ago
You can fake it, though, just like you can misspell a word in English. Write 打喷替 and someone will figure out what you mean.
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
mcguire 9y ago
Another interesting writer is John DeFrancis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_DeFrancis); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_DeFrancis); the two books I have read are Visible Speech, a general examination of writing forms, with Chinese as an important case (and it was written before Mayan writing translation was commonly known, so it makes an interesting comparison with Breaking the Maya Code), and The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy, an in-depth look at Chinese in the form of addressing some of the (really wacky) myths about Chinese writing. IIRC, he reports several actual difficulties in learning to read and write: * You have to learn many, many characters. And using a dictionary is non-trivial. (IIRC, the key is stroke order.) * You may have to learn a different language. Written Chinese is written Standard (a.k.a. Mandarin) Chinese. If you happen to have grown up speaking Cantonese, you'll have to learn a related, but different language. * Traditionally, the "proper" written language is classical, and by 'classical' I mean old. Imagine speaking modern French or Italian and writing in classical 1st century BC-1st century AD Latin. * Many characters have a "sound" component and a "meaning" component. That might help, right? You could sort of sound things out. That is, if you were into historical phonology---like every other written language, the sound component as written was frozen when the character entered the language.
- dilemma 9y ago
  >* You have to learn many, many characters. And using a dictionary is non-trivial. (IIRC, the key is stroke order.) Correct. Dictionary apps makes it easy to look up characters, however. >* You may have to learn a different language. Written Chinese is written Standard (a.k.a. Mandarin) Chinese. If you happen to have grown up speaking Cantonese, you'll have to learn a related, but different language. This is a regional/cultural thing and has nothing to do with the Chinese (Mandarin) language. French isn't a bad language because the Swiss also learn German. >* Traditionally, the "proper" written language is classical, and by 'classical' I mean old. Imagine speaking modern French or Italian and writing in classical 1st century BC-1st century AD Latin. What? Nonsensical and incorrect. Mandarin evolves like every other language in existence. >* Many characters have a "sound" component and a "meaning" component. That might help, right? You could sort of sound things out. That is, if you were into historical phonology---like every other written language, the sound component as written was frozen when the character entered the language. Again, what? 90% of Chinese characters are phonetic compounds where the component on the left modifies the sound of the main component. In general, these types of ideas that the Chinese/Japanese/other non-alphabetic languages are inferior are strongly culturally biased (what exists in my own culture is correct, other cultures are wrong) and has hints of /r/iamverysmart (you actually have no idea what you're talking about).
muddyrivers 9y ago
嚔 is indeed hard to produce, even for Chinese native speakers. It is an example of an exception, though, like entrepreneur in English (I know it is from French, so the spelling is "unusual"). First, people don't write 喷嚔 often, although they use it in spoken Chinese regularly. It seems people are reluctant to write down words that describe certain body functions. For 嚔, the difficulty is that its "sound" component is extremely rare in Chinese characters. The majority of Chinese characters are 形声字. Each of such character has a "sound" component and a "meaning" component. Many characters can share the same "sound" component. The "sound" components are usually the "harder" component in writing, in that they have more strokes. (For 嚔, the rectangle at the left is the "meaning" component. The complicated looking part at the right is the "sound" component.) As a result, if one remembers how to write one character, one can simply remember many other characters with the same "sound" component. If one of these characters is commonly used, it is an easy task to remember all the others. I only know two other characters who share the same "sound" component with 嚔, and I don't think people use them now. They only appear in ancient books. So 嚔 is a character you don't often write down, and there are no other commonly used characters who shared the same "sound" component. Then you get a character who is hard for native Chinese speakers as well.
- jessriedel 9y ago
  I like this analogy, but doesn't it just sort of point to the non-phonetic aspects of Chinese as the problem? If every time I had a hard time remembering how to spell something I couldn't even write down an approximation ("entrepenor") that someone or my computer could error-correct, it would strike me as a real flaw to the writing system! (I'm assuming here that when Chinese writers can't remember the symbol for an unusual word, they also can't write down a recognizable approximation. Maybe not true?)
  - schoen 9y ago
    They could use a computer with a pinyin input method and see a list of characters that have that pronunciation. In this case they could enter "tì" or "ti4" and get a list something like https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/t%C3%AC#Romanization https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/t%C3%AC#Romanization but probably with a nicer interface. (They do have to be able to recognize the written character when they see it. Here the character Moser was trying to produce is one of the forms under item 5.) Also, there are statistical techniques to show the most probable characters in context following particular other characters, not just the most frequent characters overall. For example, if Moser had just typed 喷 on a computer and then was looking for a character pronounced "tì", software could suggest 嚏 as the most likely possibility in that situation. But it would probably be a fairly terrible situation when not using a computer.

ufmace 9y ago

This article touches on a broader point that I had always found fascinating - what is the relationship of language to the ability of a culture to spread around the world? The promotion of American culture around the world owes a lot IMO to the British Empire and it's promotion of English around the world. Which in turn owes a lot to the culture of the British Empire, and the relatively light-handed way in which they ruled it. That's the only way it was possible for them to dominate and spread their language and culture throughout so many places. Control of it as a formal empire fell apart, but it left the seeds for kind of a soft American empire, when America became a world power and started spreading ideology and massive amounts of media around the world. It's interesting that nothing like this seems to happen for any other language and culture combination, most notably Chinese for this article. How much of the lack of ability for Chinese to spread as a culture is just how damn hard it is to learn Chinese as a non-native? Or is it that the Chinese just don't seem that interested in spreading their culture and ideology farther than they can directly benefit from? Or is the fact that they aren't interested in that based on them knowing and even taking pride in their language and culture being particularly impenetrable? Related to this article, it seems notable that movements within China to radically simplify the language never seem to pick up much steam. Sure, it would be insanely complex to do on a logistical level, but even above that, it seems like nobody is much interested in it. It reminds me a little of thinking about AIs. They say that an AI will only want to do what it gets programmed to want to do. It may become smarter and more powerful, but there's no reason for it to change what it wants to do. Changing what it wants to do would itself be an action, and it has no reason to take that action, because it isn't part of what it originally wants to do. It seems similar that cultures sort of evolve to care about some things and not care about other things, and efforts to make them care about something they don't care about at best have quite the uphill battle.

kccqzy 9y ago
> It's interesting that nothing like this seems to happen for any other language and culture combination, most notably Chinese for this article. False. It has happened. Chinese culture has spread to neighboring countries, but that's almost a millennium ago. Ever wonder why in the Unicode BMP there's a huge block of "CJK ideographs"? It's because historically the Japanese, Korean, (and Vietnamese) all use Chinese characters in their communication. Sure their respective languages are very different but the script is the same. And at that time China had plenty of influence over these neighboring countries.

peterburkimsher 9y ago

Chinese is here to stay. There are enough people who speak it. Characters are not the problem. Simplified characters made it twice as complicated. What Chinese and Japanese need are spaces. I struggled for 2 years to study Chinese here in Taiwan. I tried many ways (see the blog), and wasn't picking it up. Then I wrote Pingtype, which puts spaces between the words, colours for tones, and a literal translation. I started reading the Bible every day using it, and also listening to music and reading the lyrics. Since then I've learned so much more. https://pingtype.github.io https://pingtype.github.io The problem is not the language. It's the education materials. Now I think that traditional characters are better, because I can rebuild a character from typing only the parts I know into Pingtype's keyboard and searching for a suitable match. I had to build my own tools, but I wish these could be popularised to help the thousands of foreigners who give up learning Chinese. Support for Taiwanese Hokkien is also included in Pingtype, thanks to the Taigi dictionary for POJ transcription. See the Advanced -> Regional section. It is very different to Mandarin, but learning Chinese is a necessary stepping stone. I'm working on a lyrics video of some popular songs by Fire Ex as some educational materials. Please give me feedback on Pingtype; only a few hundred people have visited the page and it's kind of depressing. I don't know how to do marketing, so it's not catching on. Even if the tone colours and pinyin don't become widely used, I really wish that spaces between words could be introduced to this beautiful language.

dionian 9y ago
I am not sure I know what you mean by 'spaces', but I think I do. It's the fact that there is no natural separation of grouped words. Without vocab it's really hard to understand a sentence. Also there is a cultural element (much more so than other languages perhaps) But thats kind of the advantage too, there is no preset standard grammatical way of looking at anything, you simply take it all in and infer everything on context. No learning verb conjugations and endless rules like in some languages (I'm looking at you, French) People are saying Chinese is harder to learn than other languages, and it's true, but mostly only for the first few years, after that, it's way easier to learn than a new romance language for a native speaker of a romance language
- 9y ago

ilamont 9y ago

A couple of thoughts to share, as someone who studied Mandarin in Taiwan the 1990s, encourages his kids to learn Chinese (1), and still loves to study 4-character colloquialisms: * "Chinese is a world script" - The author Tom Mullaney notes the rising popularity of Chinese classes in schools all over the world. I think Chinese script is actually holding back Mandarin from becoming more widely spoken. It's difficult to write properly, and adds another layer of complexity to remembering vocabulary. I think it's much easier for people to learn a language that has an alphabet-based script, and it's possible to go further with such a language in a given period of time. * Paradoxically, the rise of software to write Chinese characters has really made it much easier to write. I say this as someone who learned in the dark ages before such software was widely available. If I had to write a sentence in Chinese using a pen and paper it would be painful for both myself and the reader ... but on my phone or using a laptop or desktop computer I can manage social media, email, and other lightweight uses thanks to easy pinyin input systems. It's improved my reading ability, too, because now I am interacting in Chinese on my devices using language that's more like spoken Mandarin, whereas 20 years ago most of the printed materials I encountered tended to be written in more formal style. * Mandarin as a world language. The increasing importance of the Chinese economy is becoming a big driver for spoken Mandarin in other parts of the world. I've encountered Thais and Vietnamese who can speak it quite well (but not write) in order to do business or interact with Chinese tourists. A friend who recently visited Italy saw the same thing in high-end shops with young Italians behind the counters being able to speak proficient Mandarin. * I disagree with the idea presented by @peterburkimsher that a lack of spaces are a problem. Chinese grammar is very straightforward, and in my opinion it's not hard to figure where words start and end (even if you don't know a specific term). (Incidentally, kudos to Peter for developing his system ... I don't have specific suggestions to market it, but I like the idea of leveraging Fire Ex and other hooks). * There are interesting examples in Vietnam (2) and Korea of societies that abandoned Chinese characters in favor of their own alphabets. It's true that cultures lose the connection with ancient literature and older historical documents ... but not their history, thanks to the spread of literacy and public education combined with a strong interest in history and famous people from centuries past. 1. http://www.ilamont.com/2014/10/our-review-of-chinese-summer-camp-in.html http://www.ilamont.com/2014/10/our-review-of-chinese-summer-... 2. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/chunom.htm https://www.omniglot.com/writing/chunom.htm

unlmtd1 9y ago

Hanzi is a better interface between man and computers than phonetic systems, which add an additions compilation step (from phonetic to logic). The keyboard was the problem for hanzi, but now with motion, touch, speech interfaces boosted in their accuracy by ML, hanzi will dethrone Latin as the no1 man-computer interface.

grizzles 9y ago

This seems like a good thread to ask. Can anyone recommend some good Chinese language learning apps/resources? After a brief dalliance awhile back, I'd like to learn to speak Mandarin, but having learned Japanese I'm keen to avoid written literacy in the language as I know how much more that would complicate things.