> I mean that the code isn't supposed to be fighting the language. That's the issue: those programs that did best were those that fought the language the most,

> I mean that the code isn't supposed to be fighting the language. That's the issue: those programs that did best were those that fought the language the most, and those that pushed the closest to the edge of the rules. You can't, in general, look at two programs and assume they approach the problem the same way.