2 ms·
Your argument was that Google cannot fail just because they have a huge warchest, I gave you an example where they failed. Just because they have money does no
by sumedh 9y ago
Your argument was that Google cannot fail just because they have a huge warchest, I gave you an example where they failed.
Just because they have money does not automatically mean then will win the ride sharing market.
- grizzles 9y agoSo do you think they'd get some market share like Lyft and Uber have? Do you think their driveless cars (that are way ahead of everyone else) might help them lower some of their biggest costs on the supply side on sunny days when passengers need to travel low risk routes? Your argument was that they failed with G+, so that equates with this situation. I'm saying it doesn't equate. Success & failure are more granular than the binary thing you are making it out to be. G+ brought Google other benefits.
- sumedh 9y ago> Success & failure are more granular than the binary thing you are making it out to be. Exactly, now you get it. Just because a company has huge warchest does not automatically mean they will succeed at everything.