3 ms·

So...she stood up to the Obama/Trump "criminal government." Got it, and I agree completely. > "It is clearly not going to be good for the military-industrial c

So...she stood up to the Obama/Trump "criminal government." Got it, and I agree completely. > "It is clearly not going to be good for the military-industrial complex if more, younger people, start questioning the lies they are told about why their nation state is at war, exporting wholesale destruction to the world." I agree completely. Also, we shouldn't let up on our "questioning" simply because someone from our club is president.

mmjaa 9y ago
I would argue it was Bush/Obama/Trump .. I mean, the 'collateral damage' video wouldn't have been so harmful to the so-called integrity of national security, if in fact Bush hadn't pushed the USA into such a heinous, destructive, evil war .. in the first place. We should also not make the mistake of personalising the criminal government around the single figurehead. Sure, Trump hate is in fashion, as was Obama hate and Bush hate, but its a much, much bigger problem than can just be represented by a figurehead. Those figureheads are there to direct our hatred from the real targets behind the scenes: the generals and CEO's currently driving Americas' military-industrial complex into endless conquering follies.