9 ms·
> Not sure if I agree. You mean that, people will have to choose for paying for subscriptions, so the best quality articles after a paywall will get the money b
by ashark 9y ago
> Not sure if I agree. You mean that, people will have to choose for paying for subscriptions, so the best quality articles after a paywall will get the money by creating better articles. But it leaves less space for everyone else. I'm not sure if that is a good thing, but I understand the reasoning
No. Again, paying for subscriptions would not be the only option. Internet advertising would still exist without tracking. It'd just be harder to sell as a small-time operator. Winners in a no-tracking world: large, trustworthy sites. Losers: ad networks/spying companies, small ad-supported sites.