Well my assumption is that liberty, life, and property are things that can be taken away. edit: I may have misunderstood your comment. I mean that human rights

Well my assumption is that liberty, life, and property are things that can be taken away. edit: I may have misunderstood your comment. I mean that human rights are things that are violated by taking them away, not failing to give them to you. So while life can be taken from you, doing so would violate human rights. Whereas arguing that internet is a human right doesn't work with this model, because the current violation of that 'right' doesn't just result from someone taking something away, but from someone failing to give it to you.