3 ms·
Actually a portraitist could do more with this than with a photo. When someone works from a photo, what you tend to get is that photo, reproduced in paint. Yo
by pg 16y ago
Actually a portraitist could do more with this than with a photo. When someone works from a photo, what you tend to get is that photo, reproduced in paint. You can usually tell when a portrait is done from a photo because the subject has the sort of fleeting facial expression people wear only briefly in photographs. You could probably avoid that working from video, and get something more like you'd get if someone sat for you in person.
- kirubakaran 16y agoIn that case, sending the portraitist a 3 minute video would be better? They could loop it until they are done. Doing it asynchronously seems to be so advantageous. Can it not be done without sacrificing quality?
- slantyyz 16y agoYes, but there is a catch. If you do a video yourself, it may not show much of your personality. A good artist (or photographer) can get more out of a person through face to face verbal communication. So Diy video, ok, face time, better, recorded videoconference, best.