9 ms·
> 5. I wonder which implementation of Lua they used. There is a table with the versions they used¹, but they don't mention the implementation – in can be infer
by shock 9y ago
> 5. I wonder which implementation of Lua they used.
There is a table with the versions they used¹, but they don't mention the implementation – in can be inferred for some: e.g. for Pascal they used the Free Pascal Compiler.
① - https://sites.google.com/view/energy-efficiency-languages/setup https://sites.google.com/view/energy-efficiency-languages/se...
- vvanders 9y agoOuch, they used Lua 5.3 LuaJIT is at least an order of magnitude(10x) faster.
- leggomylibro 9y agoTo the point where a lot of popular libraries (like Love2D) use LuaJIT by default. IIRC, Lapis (Lua-based web framework) can be easily configured for it as well. I'd be interested in seeing how it fared; Lua really is a nice language.
- etiene 9y agoLapis afaik also uses LuaJIT by default because it's built for openresty which does use LuaJIT