4 ms·
You said KDE was non-free and therefore it doesn't respect freedom that much. I argued that KDE acknowledged that depending on a non-free toolkit was not reall
by emilsedgh 9y ago
You said KDE was non-free and therefore it doesn't respect freedom that much.
I argued that KDE acknowledged that depending on a non-free toolkit was not really OK for a free desktop. Therefore, from the very beginning it tried to fix that. And it succeeded very early by making Qt go open source.
Even rms considers KDE free.
- carussell 9y ago> You said KDE was non-free and therefore it doesn't respect freedom that much. See, the issue is that I've written what I meant to say, but you're substituting those comments with whatever you seem to want me to have said instead and implicitly asking me to take responsibility for your version.