3 ms·
Apple has all this; if you play in their court. But that's who they are. Everything is set up to "synchronize" with one number. If my phone rings, my watch als
by EADGBE 9y ago
Apple has all this; if you play in their court. But that's who they are. Everything is set up to "synchronize" with one number.
If my phone rings, my watch also does (when it's on my wrist, no cellular required), so does my iPad. I can answer on these devices. I can also make calls on them from my iPhone number.
I don't have a mac at home (because, why desktop?) but If I did it would also ring and allow me to make calls from it too.
iMessages and text messages work the same way, alerts and ability to reply on the watch, synchronization with my iPad and iPhone, and the Messaging app on OSX.
- chrishynes 9y agoYep, but only if you play in their sandbox. I'm not going to jump from one walled garden to another, particularly when it's going from GV which is at least cross platform to a Apple only solution. I'd be tempted if they ever had a Windows app that actually worked and was supported, but they've killed off everything. Or if they had an API for iMessages so third parties could access it.
- EADGBE 9y ago> Yep, but only if you play in their sandbox. So true. Why is this becoming more and more common? The internet, and all its byproducts, used to be open.