4 ms·
> I'd suggest that Dropbox users somewhat self select for those not as concerned about security as others. And more concerned about availability. I would rathe
by dx034 9y ago
> I'd suggest that Dropbox users somewhat self select for those not as concerned about security as others. And more concerned about availability.
I would rather say that Dropbox is being used by many people without tech knowledge. And while they might be concerned about security, they often just don't know how improtant 2 factor authentication is. At least that's what I can see for some friends & family.
- y4mi 9y agoeeh, since when does u2a protect against back-end breaches? thats just a security layer against phishing or password leaks... don't get me wrong, i'd advice everyone to use it for anything remotely critical, because its pretty easy to setup and live with, but it really doesnt help against state actors or hackers that compromised the data servers.
- hellofunk 9y ago> since when does u2a protect against back-end breaches? Because if someone steals your DB password, they still won't be able to login to your account. Maybe they won't have to, if they also stole your data and found a way to decrypt it, but since those are different things, it is plausible that there could be a leak of login information without a leak of data, in which case your two-factor authentication would keep the attackers out of your data.
- ProblemFactory 9y ago> since when does u2a protect against back-end breaches? It doesn't have to. For 99.999% people, the two most realistic threats are: * There is a keylogger on some computer where you access your Dropbox, for example at a print shop, * You use the same password on many sites, one gets compromised, and automated bots try to access your Dropbox account.
- dx034 9y agoA Dropbox hack is nothing most users have to protect themselves against. Same as with a google breach where GMail data gets leaked. As a personal user of no special interest, no one would use a potential Dropbox vulnerability to just get your data. If you secure your end you'll be fine. That's different for big corporations or people with a public profile (e.g. politicians). In this case you have to ensure that malicious actors with a lot of money and knowledge cannot gain access. But then again, self hosting is likely less secure than Dropbox or Google.
- Angostura 9y agoI have tech knowledge, but I had absolutely no knowledge that Dropbox offered 2-factor. I don't keep confidential stuff in DB because, I know that the company effectively has access to everything. Nonetheless, 2 factor sounds interesting. So I look at this: https://www.dropbox.com/help/security/enable-two-step-verification https://www.dropbox.com/help/security/enable-two-step-verifi... Right. Now I understand why so few people have it enabled.
- hellofunk 9y agoExplain? You read a page about two-step and say that explains why no one has enabled it? You claim to have tech knowledge, but are not able to turn on this simple security setting (or even know it exists, despite that it's listed very clearly in your Dropbox settings page)? I use two-factor/two-step verification on every single service I have, including all social media accounts, email accounts, etc. Most major services/sites these days provide it. The way Dropbox does it is no different than any others; it takes 2 minutes to set it up. What did you find difficult about it?
- woogley 9y ago> You claim to have tech knowledge, but are not able to turn on this simple security setting GP didn't say _they_ can't enable it after reading the help page. I think they are implying that the very detailed help page looks long and complicated to a non-techie (who might not even understand the benefit of going through such a hurdle in the first place).
- Angostura 9y ago> Before enabling two-step verification, you'll receive ten 8-digit backup codes. It is very important that you write these codes down and store them somewhere safe. Do any of your other systems handle recovery like that?