3 ms·
Why didn't you just use Arch-Anywhere? https://arch-anywhere.org/ https://arch-anywhere.org/ Besides, the manual installation process of Arch does not consist
by erikbye 9y ago
Why didn't you just use Arch-Anywhere?
https://arch-anywhere.org/ https://arch-anywhere.org/
Besides, the manual installation process of Arch does not consist of that many steps; it takes but a few minutes (perhaps not the first time). To shorten it further you can write your own installation script or use extant ones, of which there are many (Arch-Anywhere being one).
I harp on Arch-Anywhere because Antergos != Arch and Arch > Antergos and other derivations.
- towb 9y agoMaybe I'll try it next time. Not sure yet what Antergos will do for me, except the installer, but for this install, and so far, I'm happy with it. It's still mostly arch anyway. It's not that it is too hard or takes very long time, but I still have to pull up my notes and do it.
- axaxs 9y agoAntergos IS Arch, depending on how you look at it. It's not like the Ubuntu->Debian relationship. Installing Antergos gives you a fully functional Arch install.
- erikbye 9y agohttps://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/4uzev2/antergos_arch_help_the_antergos_community/ https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/4uzev2/antergos_...
- axaxs 9y agoAntergos installs arch. It has a repo to provide certain packages that aren't provided by Arch repos. Support I agree with. If you have a problem installing Antergos or one of its packages, ask us, not the arch forums.