3 ms·
There must be a definition of rich and poor. It should not be devised by looking at the wealth. It should be devised by looking at the living standards, educati
by jamesmattis 9y ago
There must be a definition of rich and poor. It should not be devised by looking at the wealth. It should be devised by looking at the living standards, education system, environment, law and order, equality, zero racism. And where people can live an anxiety/depression free life. Where there is welfare, care, love grows everyday for each other.
- amrrs 9y agoOne metric come across in these discussions is 'GNH' - Gross National Happiness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_National_Happiness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_National_Happiness
- stun 9y agoThe zero racism part is not gonna slide with the so-called developed countries
- imperfect_cat 9y agoSadly, that defines one race countries. No racism possible when there are no races but one. Personally, I think this definition is bad because it progress free. Anxiety free is has no scale. If you are massively anxious I. Country A, and mildly anxious in B, both fail. Need to rethink this.
- tim333 9y agoThere still seems a fair bit of racism in mostly one race countries, say Japan for example. There seems less in widely mixed places, say London or Singapore.
- nostromo123 9y agoYeah, London, where not being of the "correct" religion can get you killed in some areas! (I know, religion is not a race, etc....my point is that mixed places are not necessarily more tolerant)