4 ms·
I think people need to be very careful about what assets they're selling with ICOs. Check out this framework put out by Debevoise and Plimpton[0] and make sure
by lowglow 9y ago
I think people need to be very careful about what assets they're selling with ICOs.
Check out this framework put out by Debevoise and Plimpton[0] and make sure you're NOT selling securities.
If your asset is a security, it won't have any liquidity because exchanges must now be licensed to be a security exchange (which doesn't exist in crypto-land yet), so there is no upside for investors. A lot of this is heavily pulled from the SEC's investigation into the DAO[1].
If you're selling a token/coin as anything else, it seems the SEC is taking these things by a case-by-case basis to determine if what type of asset class they are.
If you're looking to ICO (pre-sale and launch) use management and KYC (Know Your Customer) software[2]. It saves a ton of pain and suffering in the long run.
And as always rule number one is: Don't commit fraud.
[0] https://www.coinbase.com/legal/securities-law-framework.pdf https://www.coinbase.com/legal/securities-law-framework.pdf
[1] https://www.sec.gov/litigation/investreport/34-81207.pdf https://www.sec.gov/litigation/investreport/34-81207.pdf
[2] https://presale.synapse.ai/ https://presale.synapse.ai/
- seibelj 9y agoI guarantee you Kik spent at least $1mil in legal bills for their ICO, I assume they know what they are doing
- JackFr 9y agoI think you're optimistic. There's gonna be a lot of tears and recriminations.
- bencoder 9y agoin the FAQ it seems they required full KYC details for the pre-registration for different funding levels: https://kin.kik.com/files/faq.pdf https://kin.kik.com/files/faq.pdf
- lowglow 9y agoThis wasn't directed at Kuk but rather more towards the people looking to ICO. Be careful out there, hackers. :)