We always suggested to activists to consider the geopolitical loyalty of the company selling your software (especially security software) when picking a provide

We always suggested to activists to consider the geopolitical loyalty of the company selling your software (especially security software) when picking a provider. Its a crappy rule of thumb but can occasionally be helpful. Working in/on Russia - not Kaspersky Working in/on Israel - not Checkpoint Working in/on UK (e.g drone strikes) - not Sophos Working in/on US - etc etc Ultimately capability and costs of the software was the main thing but the more you heard about Kaspersky style stuff, the more its seems relevant. Hanging around the security space long enough, you meet people at Western security software companies who quietly will express some concern about what goes on inside their own places. It reminds me of Huawei hysteria.