3 ms·

> The nature of the site doesn't lend itself to public bookmarks at all, as there is no list of bookmarks to publicise in the first place. Question: Are you bu

> The nature of the site doesn't lend itself to public bookmarks at all, as there is no list of bookmarks to publicise in the first place. Question: Are you building a fun tool for the good of humanity, or do you plan to make money at some point? From everything that I've seen, making a way to publicise a list of bookmarks could help you if you're going the latter route. > It might, however, be a typical case of the users not knowing what they want, because nobody seems to mind facebook... Yes, my first thought was, "I'd only use this if it's private" - my second thought was, "Wait, actually, I'd use it either way, pretty similarly, and there'd be additional value if it's public." I might see what people choose instead of what people say. People talk a lot and then do different things. Just something to think about, and congrats on launching a pretty cool service.

StavrosK 16y ago
Your points are very valid. It is also my personal opinion that people say one thing and do another, as far as privacy is concerned. I will put the policy change on the table and we will think about ways to make the service amenable to shared bookmarks, as it would indeed be a good feature. Currently, a way of sharing that I, personally, have found works pretty well is to enable AutoTweet, which tweets your historified links with a tag. Then you can search for #historified and you see links people all over the world have historified. That is just an aside, however, and we will absolutely look into link sharing. We don't want to use your links for nefarious purposes or to divulge anything embarrassing, but having a more lax policy that enables sharing is something we do want. Thank you again for your feedback, it is sincerely appreciated.