As I wrote above, I am only interested in hypotheses that are physical. Perhaps you mean less fundamental than a field? I'm open to that. This paper is very int

As I wrote above, I am only interested in hypotheses that are physical. Perhaps you mean less fundamental than a field? I'm open to that. This paper is very interesting, thank you. I read it as proposing a self-referential, possibly recursive, stack of attention processes and models. Sounds like Hofstadter's ideas.