While there is potentially an argument to me made that a hostile government could use this expanded power to "regulate" for some nefarious purpose, you have to

While there is potentially an argument to me made that a hostile government could use this expanded power to "regulate" for some nefarious purpose, you have to actually go that far for it to be an argument. For example {hypothetical} "Net Neutrality gives alphabet-soup-agency a form of super-DMCA that I don't trust them to have"