3 ms·
I'll assume this a genuine question and give a genuine answer. > Why not groups? Because many things you would want to combine don't have inverses. Does the
by tome 9y ago
I'll assume this a genuine question and give a genuine answer.
> Why not groups?
Because many things you would want to combine don't have inverses. Does the list [1,2,3] have an inverse? No. That's why lists form a monoid and not a group.
> Why not vector spaces?
Because all finite dimensional real vector spaces are isomorphic to R^n so we tend just to use the concrete instances of tuples of floating point numbers.