3 ms·
Another good source for Steve Bannon's views comes somewhat ironically from Buzzfeed: https://www.buzzfeed.com/lesterfeder/this-is-how-steve-bannon-sees-the-en
by guildwriter 9y ago
Another good source for Steve Bannon's views comes somewhat ironically from Buzzfeed:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/lesterfeder/this-is-how-steve-bannon-sees-the-entire-world?utm_term=.lrJxmWNQV#.famQybKvx https://www.buzzfeed.com/lesterfeder/this-is-how-steve-banno...
In regards to your point about arguing in favor of the working man, here's an excerpt from a response about how to counter ethnic/racial tribalism:
"I think in Spain it’s something like 50 or 60% of the youth under 30 are underemployed. And that means the decade of their twenties, which is where you have to learn a skill, where you have to learn a craft, where you really start to get comfortable in your profession, you’re taking that away from the entire generation. That’s only going to fuel tribalism, that’s only going to fuel [unintelligible]… That’s why to me, it’s incumbent upon freedom-loving people to make sure that we sort out these governments and make sure that we sort out particularly this crony capitalism so that the benefits become more of this entrepreneurial spirit and that can flow back to working-class and middle-class people. Because if not, we’re going to pay a huge price for this. You can already start to see it."
- mnglkhn2 9y agoThank you for your excerpt, which is very good. I am sad to see that you're being down-voted by the brigade assigned to HN. No arguments just down-votes!
- sctb 9y agoPlease stop breaking the guidelines. We've already asked you several times and we ban accounts that won't post within them. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- mnglkhn2 9y agoIs this for real?! Which guidelines are you talking about that are broken? You mean to say that asking for arguments/specifics is something that goes against HN guidelines?! Now it looks like it becomes an issue if you ask somebody to argue his/her statement. And if you praise somebody for providing a specific piece of info, at the expense of being down-voted, even that becomes controversial. What school of thought are you guys applying to this? And how-come you show up to moderate this one week after everything has settled? This is an ideological witch hunt on your side. And where can I verify your mod status? Who is to say that you are not simply pretending to be a mod and acting to stifle rational dialogue?! I have a suggestion: to make things truly arbitrary, please ban me, and then I will be sure that you are a moderator. For such a sad joke, feel free to ban this account. I am not interested in playing in your box.