It seems my comment was not precise enough. The result is the following assumptions being made: 1. The thinking/insight/ideas is in pursuit of proving my own s

It seems my comment was not precise enough. The result is the following assumptions being made: 1. The thinking/insight/ideas is in pursuit of proving my own special nature 2. The thinking/insights/ideas are purely theories and have no practical application Notice that the word "problem" was used. What is meant here an actual problem that I am trying to solve with actual practical implications. Let me clarify what I mean, using concrete examples: In product development/startups/business space: "My customers are telling me their problem is X, but what they are doing or how they are doing it is Contradictory. Why is this?" "Two customers have completely different and contradictory views on what feature/problem is important to them, why is this?" The actual purpose is to understand your customer better so you can cater for what they actually need. This part is confusing, can you clarify what you mean: "Then those parameters would be defined by your experience, which requires you to get out of your mind and earn on the outside"