> I'm disagreeing with you, not ignoring. You sounds like you think I agree with you when you don't explain your position & say we agree. Saying 'economics is

> I'm disagreeing with you, not ignoring. You sounds like you think I agree with you when you don't explain your position & say we agree. Saying 'economics is the same as <new subject>' is not a compelling argument without some justification behind it. > That doesn't mean a lack of certainty in some facets make economics not valuable. I'm specifically talking about the perfect free market model. I've always been talking about it. I put it to you that: this model is useless, and not comparable to the equivalent simple models in physics. > Economics are no different. They are different: it involves predicting the behaviour of a population of humans who are making high-level decision which affect their or others lives.