4 ms·
This isn't really fair to the site creator. The images you linked to are still hosted on their site and seem to be overloading their server without any benefit
by qixxiq 16y ago
This isn't really fair to the site creator. The images you linked to are still hosted on their site and seem to be overloading their server without any benefit to them.
Maybe there was a reason they didn't want people viewing all 365 at a time?
- shib71 16y agoAs far as my attempts are concerned their server was always overloaded. If they were serving the files from AWS (or similar) now perhaps they could have managed a page like this themselves.
- lrm242 16y agoThen don't use THEIR service? Effectively DoS'ing the site isn't the answer. They weren't arbitrarily slowing things down just to piss you off. Like the OP said, they probably served so few because that's all they could handle.
- shib71 16y agoTrue. My point was that serving static files is one of the easiest parts of a website to scale.