> Lovely, so I can officially claim I use a standard that is required by many commenters here if I just hash random bytes! Stop pretending that you don't under

> Lovely, so I can officially claim I use a standard that is required by many commenters here if I just hash random bytes! Stop pretending that you don't understand what a cryptological hash function is, or that using a strong crypto function is the same as rolling your own, or that using the hash function on your input is the same as running it on random bytes. > Thanks for your analysis! Thanks for the anecdotal evidence.