3 ms·
And no evidence against it. I believe it was intended as a hypothesis.
by sjeohp 9y ago
And no evidence against it. I believe it was intended as a hypothesis.
- Twisell 9y agoWhile most of the comment is indeed a very detailed and interesting analysis, the last part is unfortunately looking like a "it was better before" nostalgia bias. I'm currently writing my phd project (after having worked for 10 years in a company) and I'm absolutely stunned by the current easiness to access papers and informations compared to just 10 year ago when I left university. I concure however that a new and real challenge is now to be able to filter the noise induced by this overwhelming volume of available information. But I don't think nostalgia is an useful tool to reach this goal. PS: To illustrate https://xkcd.com/1601/ https://xkcd.com/1601/ (And I believe there was another comic that it traced it back to Greek philosophers that rejected writing. Thanks to whoever remember the link!)