3 ms·
The musician can display whatever they want on their website; they don't have to host content they don't like. In the "dream" commenting system, the comments ar
by unescape 9y ago
The musician can display whatever they want on their website; they don't have to host content they don't like. In the "dream" commenting system, the comments are independent; you can apply your own filters and fetch comments from sources the site owner may not approve of.
- s73ver_ 9y agoBut they're still associated with that site, and that musician.
- unescape 9y agoOnly in the sense that someone who makes a Wix site that says "Neil Young Sux" is associated with Neil Young.
- s73ver_ 9y agoI disagree. I don't think this is like that at all. Especially given now that comments are displayed on the actual site in question. If you're going to say it's something separate, then now you're talking about Twitter or, more likely, Mastodon.
- unescape 9y agoIf you look at the top-level comment you're replying to, we're describing "an ideal commenting system", not Mozilla Talk.