4 ms·
How would they be able to quickly take the wheel and brake if something happens? I think the opposite is true, if you need longer reaction time it's probably a
by sorenjan 9y ago
How would they be able to quickly take the wheel and brake if something happens? I think the opposite is true, if you need longer reaction time it's probably a bad idea to not be fully immersed in the driving until an accident is imminent.
- pavlov 9y agoI'm thinking of a scenario where the driver is holding the wheel, but the computer is actually doing the driving most of the time while giving just enough feedback to the driver to feel like she is in charge.
- mandevil 9y agoIn our tests a decade ago, we found that shared autonomy was actually much more frustrating for users than either full or no autonomy. When you were telling the computer to go over there and the computer wanted to go over here, it left all of the users frustrated and complaining that the computer wouldn't let them go where they wanted. Maybe you can come up with a better adjudication system than we did, but it is very tricky to design the system so that it catches when the user does something stupid but not when they are doing the right thing- if the computer could figure out the right thing you wouldn't need the human!
- pavlov 9y agoInteresting, cool to hear your experience!
- CardenB 9y agoIt's actually harder to drive in these scenarios because your reaction time needs to be faster and your takeover has to be more aggressive. Imagine an edge case where the car veers toward another car unexpectedly. This isn't guaranteed to be avoided by level 3.