4 ms·
Other studies indicate standing all day isn't good either. You really need a combination of stand sit. I actually think ideal based on what I have read is going
by bitexploder 9y ago
Other studies indicate standing all day isn't good either. You really need a combination of stand sit. I actually think ideal based on what I have read is going to end up being some sort of very slow walk. Static positions cause edema and clotting, period. The longer you hold a static position the worse it is. It can damage muscles due to reduced blood flow and the awkward stretching of muscles and connective tissue.
I don't do this myself, but I think folks that can manage to slow walk at a tread desk are going to be the best and gaining back those years static positions shave.
Yes, standing causes people to move around more, but I actually find standing dramatically more tiring than tread-desking when I have tried it. I prefer sitting and regular movement from the sitting position, tread desking, and finally standing desks.
Personally, standing is also just not comfortable. I have run 50 mile races, and lift heavy things regularly for many years, so I have the physical conditioning for it... I just find it is the most draining way to work. It feels much harder on my body than walking all day or sitting and moving around at regular intervals.
- nxsynonym 9y agoI'm not much of a desk-stander my self, but it's nice to have the option. To clarify, I was advocating encouraging more options for desk workers - not strictly standing at work. It would also be nice to have a longer standard lunch period. I would love to be able to work out and eat in the middle of my day, but 30 mins just isn't enough.
- magic_beans 9y agoAre you in a white-collar job? I'm a web dev and I've never worked at a place where your lunch break was capped. Many people in the office head out to the gym in the middle of the day, or go on long lunches when work is light.
- nxsynonym 9y agowhite collar but still on hourly, unfortunately.