4 ms·
Reading this, it seems like one of (at least) two things might be true: 1) The article is written for other members of the author's group, but wasn't really me
by MikeTheGreat 9y ago
Reading this, it seems like one of (at least) two things might be true:
1) The article is written for other members of the author's group, but wasn't really meant for broad consumption.
Yes, it's online, in public, etc, but either the author wasn't thinking about that and/or ignored it. I say this because it feels like something one would say when complaining to friends at a pub after hours. It's got this "we've all been here, don't you just hate it?" sorta vibe to it.
2) The article is written to be click-bait/incendiary on purpose.
A while back (a year or two?) someone else wrote something similar and it blew up big. More than anything it gave people something to shake their fist at. It gave older people an excuse to look down on "the kids today", younger folk could shake their fist at the poor treatment they receive from older people. I wonder if this author is also trying to go viral in a similar sort of way.
I feel like it takes a particular skill to write these sorts of things - it's gotta be believable that a 22 year old would write this, but also push enough of the older generation's buttons that it'll inflame them, too.
3) Obviously, there's other possibilities that I hadn't thought of that might be true :)