12 ms·
Wait, did you really just say, “I acknowledge there is no evidence” immediately followed by “there is no evidence for the absence of evidence”? If I’m not miss
by mercutio2 9y ago
Wait, did you really just say, “I acknowledge there is no evidence” immediately followed by “there is no evidence for the absence of evidence”?
If I’m not missing something you though was implicit somehow, that is some pretty remarkable logic.
- vasilipupkin 9y agoThere is evidence, but it's relatively weak from statistical significance point of view. This is also true of Saez's claims, such as if only we get rid of lower taxation on capital, things will improve for the 99%. I am not aware of any evidence that would support this prediction.