2 ms·
Granted, in part. Especially on interior manufacturing, where Tesla's flagship Model-S luxury sedan could stand to learn a thing or two from Mercedes, and in s
by LeifCarrotson 9y ago
Granted, in part. Especially on interior manufacturing, where Tesla's flagship Model-S luxury sedan could stand to learn a thing or two from Mercedes, and in sheet metal stamping/carbon fiber fabrication, where OEMs do invest a lot of attention.
But I maintain that the primary focus of an automotive manufacturer is their powertrain. This is evidenced by the outsourcing of many of those other components, and by the relative budgets given to those different R&D departments. Furthermore, the other departments have become tightly coupled to the powertrain: The chassis is largely designed around the engine bay, not a large battery and electric motor. Engine braking is barely an afterthought in the design of the brakes, and regenerative braking changes a lot of that design. Auxiliary systems like entertainment, power steering, air conditioning, etc. have the existence of an alternator and serpentine belt as a fundamental principle.
Whether it's 180 or 90 degrees, it's still a difficult change for a big company.
- arethuza 9y ago"primary focus of an automotive manufacturer is their powertrain" The VW Group re-uses the same engines across lots of its different brands - for a high-performance or electric car then of course the powertrain is important. For everything else its just one component and as long as it is good enough I suspect people aren't really that interested. Edit: Other manufacturers may do this, I'm just more familiar with VW Group cars.
- kgwgk 9y ago> Other manufacturers may do this They all reuse components and designs as much as possible: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_platform https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_platform