3 ms·
He could've deleted the photo. Instead he had the right to copy the photo and as exclusive owner that was his exclusive copyright. At which point would that hav
by posterboy 9y ago
He could've deleted the photo. Instead he had the right to copy the photo and as exclusive owner that was his exclusive copyright. At which point would that have been lost?
- kuschku 9y agoCopyright protection only applies if you, personally, had a major share in creating something. A good example are music remixes, you need to actually contribute a lot yourself to have copyright. If your camera gets stolen by someone, and they take a picture, without you having any influence in that, you do not own the picture. You can not force people who want to use it to pay.
- posterboy 9y agomusic is an analogy and not informative. A camera thieve shouldn't profit from a misdeed, and the picture shouldn't be in the public domain by default. So, the photo has to be deleted because noone can claim copyright?