I don't have a working "gaydar" but I do believe that it's real (meaning there are people who can predict better than chance). In the same way people can learn

I don't have a working "gaydar" but I do believe that it's real (meaning there are people who can predict better than chance). In the same way people can learn to sex chicks based on intuition after some training: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-incredible-intuition-of-professional-chicken-sexers-2012-3 http://www.businessinsider.com/the-incredible-intuition-of-p... Is it that doubtful that a ML algorithm can reach/exceed human-levels on this "gaydar" problem?