4 ms·
> To answer your first question: Correlation could exist, but the idea that they are correlated implies that my physical features will change when my sexual pre
by jamesrcole 9y ago
> To answer your first question: Correlation could exist, but the idea that they are correlated implies that my physical features will change when my sexual preference changes. Ponder that for a minute.
Why couldn't physical features change?
I believe hormone changes can affect appearances, so it doesn't seem beyond the realm of possibility.
> Sexuality is not a boolean value, it's not a yes or no, it's not a this or that
Did it occur to you that possibly the correlation with facial characteristics could be a matter of degree?
Consider the correlation between facial characteristics and racial background. I'm half European, half Asian. There's going to be a stronger correlation between people with near 100% European ancestry and "European facial characteristics" than people with 50% European ancestry, than people with 25% European ancestry, etc
- sova 9y agoMy point is that Sexuality is not classifiable like Eye Color is classifiable, and we should not treat it as such.