I'd argue you are anti-strawmanning. As with all these debates, there is a spectrum of opinions, but plenty of high profile (if not entirely serious) people do

I'd argue you are anti-strawmanning. As with all these debates, there is a spectrum of opinions, but plenty of high profile (if not entirely serious) people do have implicit (and even explicit) beliefs closer to the strawman than what you have outlined. Or they may agree with what you say as far as it goes but then reject any implications or further analysis based on those and similar facts.