4 ms·
> If everyone started requiring the use of a dragnet surveillance program just to log in to services, it would become next to impossible to protect yourself. Y
by ineptech 9y ago
> If everyone started requiring the use of a dragnet surveillance program just to log in to services, it would become next to impossible to protect yourself.
Yes, this is true. If all websites start requiring their visitors to do something their visitors overwhelmingly don't want, the result would be something their visitors don't want. Kind of suggests that they won't do that, yes?
We will probably have to agree to disagree here; you're imagining a world where oauth.fed.gov slowly becomes more and more widespread until it's ubiquitous and we have no other options, and that just doesn't sound realistic to me. (I think it would struggle for adoption even if it were implemented perfectly and had the best privacy controls possible, due to exactly the fears you're enumerating in this discussion) But we are talking about something hypothetical, so either of us could be right.
At any rate thanks for arguing forcefully but staying respectful and on topic!
- wyager 9y agoUsers generally hate Facebook login but sites use it anyway because it's good for advertising and lets them outsource fraud avoidance to Facebook. The same and more benefits (to sites, not users) apply to government provided auth. Again, please look at what's happening in South Korea. I think you're vastly underestimating how likely businesses are to adopt such a thing and how likely the government is to gradually incentivize (and eventually force) businesses into using it.