3 ms·
Why is this comment being grayed? Despite the language, this is a legitimate rebuttal. > I love how people are now all of a sudden defending the "Taxi regulat
by jameskegel 9y ago
Why is this comment being grayed? Despite the language, this is a legitimate rebuttal.
>
I love how people are now all of a sudden defending the "Taxi regulations" as if an artifical monopoly that was serving no one's best interests except for the monopoly was somehow a great thing.
Conjecture, disregarding.
> It's a lazy argument, especially for HN where old industries with arcane rules are meant to be broken.
I cannot refute this.
> calling a cab 1 hour before you needed it was required, and you wouldn't know if they would actually come or not
This is still very true.
> after waiting 1 hr they didn't come, you would be out of luck.
This is true.
> in every city where Uber pops up transportation gets better.
This is the only thing I could come close to refuting, but it'd be an argument built wholly on anecdotal evidence.
We should not be so easily provoked.
- blowski 9y agoThe comment seems to be suggesting there are only two possible positions - pro-taxi or pro-Uber. Furthermore, it suggest that HN has taken an aggregate position. In reality, I can be both pro-taxi and pro-Uber, or vice versa. Furthermore there are plenty of Uber defenders as well as attackers here on HN, so suggesting people are "all of a sudden defending taxis" seems a stretch. I agree that the taxi industry had and continues to have many problems, but I don't agree with much of Uber's behaviour either.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]